Matter intake assistant
Collect names, contact details, broad matter type, urgency, location, and document status for staff review.
Start a ProjectLegal practices can use AI agents to collect enquiry context, prepare document checklists, route matters to the right team, and reduce repetitive admin without giving legal advice.
Prospects often arrive with urgent questions, incomplete documents, and uncertainty about which practice area applies.
Start with intake and routing, then add document preparation support only with strict review and approval.
Collect names, contact details, broad matter type, urgency, location, and document status for staff review.
Share approved document lists for common enquiry types before consultation.
Prepare the enquiry for the right attorney or department without assessing the legal position.
We design agents around the small handoffs that happen every day: enquiries, reminders, document requests, summaries, and approvals.
The agent can collect the basics and flag conflicts or urgent review needs.
Prospects can receive a controlled checklist of what to bring.
The agent can draft administrative follow-ups for review after an enquiry.
The first version should be narrow, useful, and easy for your team to supervise. Once the workflow is trusted, it can be connected to more systems and more customer touchpoints.
AI agents should not guess, overpromise, expose private data, or replace professional judgement. We build the boundaries before we build the conversation.
The agent should collect information and route enquiries, not advise on rights, outcomes, or strategy.
Sensitive information needs secure collection and careful access controls.
Intake should support conflict checks before detailed conversations continue.
No. We would design it to collect information, share approved admin guidance, and route the matter to qualified professionals.
Yes, using approved checklists that the practice controls.
Only with secure collection, access controls, and clear internal handling rules.